• Home
  • Blog - Notes from a cliff-edge
  • Essays and Articles
  • Monographs
  • Edited books
  • Drawings, sketches, paintings
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Eco-Apocalypse Novels
  • openDemocracy
  • Social Media, Politics, Democracy
  • Managing Covid: a View from Political Ecology
  • Taking ‘Cli-Fi’ Seriously: comparing 'Flight Behaviour' and 'Solar'
  • Citizenship in the Anthropocene
  • Emancipation in the Anthropocene: taking the dialectic seriously

Notes from a cliff-edge

Overton's window

10/5/2025

 
690 words: 5-minute read

As far as political opinions go it’s generally believed that we get more conservative, more reactionary, as we get older.
 
It’s less often recognised that sometimes we stay the same, politically speaking, and what changes is everything around us.
 
That’s the gist of this letter from Dr Stephen Watkins of Oldham, Lancashire (and many thanks to son Patch for spotting it!).
Picture
Watkins is pointing out that progressive taxation, earned privilege, public service and a welfare state were so much the centre of political gravity in the early 1960s that they were the unquestioned bedrock of Harold Macmillan’s conservative politics. What’s moved, he says, is not him but the Overton Window.
 
I used to give lectures to University students on political ideologies - liberalism, socialism, anarchism, fascism, conservatism, ecologism. That sort of thing.
 
Once, when I was casting around for a way of locating the heart of English conservatism for students, I came across this snippet of a speech by the then Prime Minister John Major to the Conservative Group for Europe on 22nd April 1993.
 
This is what he said:
 
‘Fifty years from now Britain will still be the country of long shadows on county grounds, warm beer, invincible green suburbs, dog lovers and pools fillers’.
 
This is brilliant.
 
In a handful of redolent words Major sums up English conservatism perfectly, locating England’s future in a mythical past, which most likely never existed but which has settled status in the country’s cultural repertoire.
 
In an idle moment the other day I came across another snippet of a speech given by a major UK politician. It ran like this:
 
‘People like this – they are the real face of Britain, painting a fence, running a raffle, cutting the half-time orange, or even just that gentle knock on the door that checks your neighbour is alright ... that’s real Britain.’
 
Who was this, I wondered? The similarity with Major’s 1993 speech was uncanny. So surely a conservative politician - current Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch perhaps?
 
But no, this was UK Labour Prime Minister Keir Starmer ransacking the conservative cupboard of myths and legends for ways of articulating his latest wheeze for confronting the extreme right-wing challenge of the Reform Party: a pot-pourri patriotism. This was a key moment in his address to the Labour Party Conference on 30th September 2025, saved up for the rousing moments at the end of his speech.
 
The position of the Overton Window isn’t like the law of gravity, unavoidable, ineluctable. It’s the result of political decisions taken by a succession of politicians over the past 45 years or so which have resulted in 1960s Tory voters looking like lefty radicals today. These politicians have effectively robbed us - in the UK at least - of a whole political repertoire by making it appear outrageous, extreme, impossible.
 
The good news is that it doesn’t have to be like this. Pedro Sánchez’s socialist government in Spain, for example, offers a polar opposite option to Starmer. And in the UK itself, there’s the Green Party and the nascent Your Party to the left of Starmer.  
 
The rightward drift of the Overton Window wouldn’t have been possible without actual flesh-and-blood human beings taking it there. The roll-call of shame on the left is long and depressing, and thinking through it makes one want to jump out of an actual window.  So many missed opportunities, so many high expectations betrayed.
 
High up on the list we will surely find the current Labour Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood.
 
Here she is in 2014 at an outdoor meeting shouting that Israel’s ‘killing of children and bombing of schools and hospitals must be condemned’, and ‘we will not be silent until the Palestinians are free’.
 
And here she is in 2025 granting police forces powers to put conditions on ‘repeat protests’ as the government doubles down on the repression of pro-Palestine protest - of exactly the sort she supported in 2014.
 
It’s moot here whether it’s Mahmood or the frame of reference that’s shifted. The fact is that the blackout has been pulled down on Overton’s window and protesting genocide can land you in prison for up to 14 years.

Back in the UK/Ussr

8/24/2025

 
411 words: 3-minute read

Maybe my mistake was watching an episode of Charlie Brooker’s Black Mirror the day before departure to the UK from Spain, but as our spanking new train slid past the sleek glass-fronted apartments that line the track between Stansted and London Liverpool Street, I kept expecting something sinister to happen.
 
It was all just too good to be true.
 
And the (infuriating) ‘See it, Say it, Sorted’ incantation that’s been running on London trains for what seems like forever didn’t help, hinting as it does at the dark Black Mirror underbelly that the government would like us to think lurks just beneath the civilised and civilising veneer of British society.
 
But what are we being asked to look out for? What are we being asked to report? What will be ‘sorted’? And how?
 
The answer came the day before our arrival in the UK.
 
On that day - 9th August - over 500 people were arrested in London for carrying placards displaying the words ‘I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action’.  The Labour government proscribed Palestine Action in July under the Terrorism Act, making membership of or support for it a criminal offence, punishable by up to 14 years in prison. The arrests were the most made by the Metropolitan Police in a single day in the last 10 years.
 
The average age of those arrested was 54, and the most arrests - 147 of them - were of people aged between 60 and 69.
 
So now I know what needs to be seen, said and sorted in the UK in 2025.
 
Tens of thousands of Palestinians, mostly women and children, are being murdered by the Israeli army, the UN has declared a famine in Gaza while Israelis BBQ just over the border, Keir Starmer and David Lammy wring their hands over the ‘intolerable’ situation in Gaza having glad-handed Netanyahu and his cronies for the past two years.
 
Given all this, you’d be forgiven for thinking that ‘see it, say it, sorted’ must be aimed at keeping a look-out for those in the UK complicit in the Gaza genocide.
 
But no. In Starmer’s Mad Hatter UK it’s those who protest the genocide who need to be ‘sorted’.
Picture
​People like this old lady.

​I
f you live in the UK today, save yourself a Netflix subscription. Black Mirror is coming to a street near you.

we need to talk about palestine and action

7/26/2025

 
Picture
Here’s a scene that’s being played out pretty regularly on the streets of Britain nowadays.
 
It features a pro-Palestine protestor holding a placard outlining their belief that opposing genocide/war crimes/the holocaust in Gaza is a not a terrorist act.  
 
The placard is a comment on the recent law passed in the House of Commons, proscribing an organisation called Palestine Action - the first direct action group to be labelled terrorist.  Support for the group attracts a maximum 14 years in prison.
 
The protestor in the photograph has carefully avoided the fateful formula ‘I support Palestine Action’ by writing ‘Those who take action against genocide in Palestine are not the terrorists’. The words PALESTINE and ACTION are capitalised. Perhaps that’s what drew the attention of the two policemen who are arresting the protestor.
 
Yes, you read that right: the protestor is being arrested for carrying that placard.
 
The vast majority of commentary on what’s going on regarding Palestine protest focuses on the draconian legislation passed by a supposedly progressive Labour government that seeks to criminalise it.
 
But any legislation needs agents to put it into action - like the two policemen in this photograph. What is their role and responsibility in all this?
 
Look at them closely: all the paraphernalia of the modern police officer wrapped around two tall, bearded, well-groomed young men invested with the monumental and unassailable power of the state to do things to you that you’d rather they didn’t.
 
When they get home these two young men see what we all see on the television, our phones, tablets and laptops: chaos at Gazan feeding stations, skeletal children, grieving mothers and fathers weeping over the white shrouds covering their children, refugees murdered by Israeli forces as they try to get food, endless bombing and indiscriminate destruction.
 
Then the next day they don their uniforms and go out and arrest a few more people protesting this indescribable horror.
 
Arresting the protestor in the photograph may not mean that the policemen agree with what’s going on in Gaza. But it does mean that they are able to ignore it to the point where they are content to action the legislation that criminalises (some of) those who oppose it.
 
Question: why you are arresting this protestor?
Answer: because they might be breaking the law.
Question: is there any law you would refuse to action?
Answer: no.
Question: why?
Answer: because I am bound as a police officer to action the law.
Question: if you knew that this protestor would spend the next 14 years in jail as a result of your arrest, would you still arrest them?
Answer:  Yes.
 
In 1970 Albert Hirschman published his ‘Exit, Voice and Loyalty’, outlining the three options open to any of us working in an organisation some of whose activities we don’t endorse. ‘Voice’ relates to us voicing a complaint within the organisation, ‘Loyalty’ refers to us knuckling down and getting on with it, and ‘Exit’ involves us leaving the organisation.
 
The two policemen in the photograph are driven by Loyalty, but I'm left wondering what it would take for them to go for Voice - or even Exit?
 
In the 1945-6 Nuremberg trials it was determined that following orders was not sufficient defence to avoid punishment for war crimes. Our two policemen are not committing a war crime, though the people they are protecting from protest most certainly are.
​
Picture
​Question: what did you do to stop the genocide/war crimes/holocaust in Gaza, Daddy?
Answer: I arrested a man in a wheelchair dressed as Charlie Chaplin, carrying a copy of Picasso’s Guernica dressed in the colours of the Palestinian flag, while he played an excerpt from Chaplin’s iconic speech in ‘The Great Dictator’.
Question: Why did he play that speech?
Answer: It might have been this bit. Very powerful, but absolutely nothing to do with me.
‘Soldiers! Don’t give yourselves to brutes - men who despise you - enslave you - who regiment your lives - tell you what to do - what to think and what to feel! Who drill you - diet you - treat you like cattle, use you as cannon fodder. Don’t give yourselves to these unnatural men - machine men with machine minds and machine hearts! You are not machines! You are not cattle! You are men! You have the love of humanity in your hearts! You don’t hate! Only the unloved hate - the unloved and the unnatural! Soldiers! Don’t fight for slavery! Fight for liberty!’

    Andrew Dobson

    Archives

    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    November 2024
    August 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    January 2024
    September 2023
    January 2023
    November 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    February 2022
    September 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020

    Categories

    All
    Anthropocene
    Censorship
    Covid 19
    Gaza
    Identity Politics
    Justice
    Miscellaneous
    Politics
    Sustainability
    The Cosmos
    Ukraine

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly