• Home
  • Blog - Notes from a cliff-edge
  • Essays and Articles
  • Monographs
  • Edited books
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Eco-Apocalypse Novels
  • openDemocracy
  • Social Media, Politics, Democracy
  • Managing Covid: a View from Political Ecology
  • Taking ‘Cli-Fi’ Seriously: comparing 'Flight Behaviour' and 'Solar'

Notes from a cliff-edge

where does gold come from?

7/6/2022

 
514 words: 4-minute read
​
I’m sitting here holding my mother’s wedding ring wondering where the gold came from. I don’t mean which country it came from. I mean where did it come from?
 
Turns out that I’m holding the remnants of a star. A star that was born and died possibly billions of years ago, perhaps billions of light years away.
 
In fact it turns out that that’s where I come from too - the calcium in my teeth, the iron in my blood and the sodium in the potato I ate for lunch were all formed in dying stars.
 
It’s astonishing how recently some of the most mind-bending yet taken-for-granted discoveries were made. For example, around 100 years ago we thought there was only one galaxy - the one we inhabit, which we call the Milky Way.  Sure, there were smudges in the sky that were called nebulae, but we thought they were all patches of dust or gas in our galaxy, the Milky Way.
 
Then in the 1920s, using a technique developed by Henrietta Leavitt, Edwin Hubble worked out that a star he was studying was so far away that it had to be outside our galaxy.  In fact it was in what we now know as the Andromeda Galaxy. Anyone in the northern hemisphere with good eyesight can see Andromeda (better with binoculars or a small telescope) - and it’s quite something to think that the photons striking your eye set out on their journey two million years ago.
 
Suddenly the universe was way bigger than we ever thought it was.  Now we know that there are between 100 and 200 billion galaxies in the universe - not just the one we thought until about 100 years ago.
 
And it wasn’t until even more recently - 1946 - when Fred Hoyle published ‘The Synthesis of the Elements from Hydrogen’ in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, that we learned how the heavier elements were made.
 
Here is part of the article’s abstract:
 
‘Stars that have exhausted their supply of hydrogen in regions where thermonuclear reactions are important enter a collapsing phase. If the mass of the star exceeds Chandrasekhar's limit [i.e. greater than 1.44 times the mass of our sun] collapse will continue until rotational instability occurs. Rotational instability enables the star to throw material off to infinity … The process of rotational instability enables the heavy elements built up in collapsing stars to be distributed in interstellar space’ (emphasis added).
 
Almost all the elements in the periodic table were created in dying stars.  When a star begins to run out of hydrogen towards the end of its life, it expands into a Red Giant (when our sun does this it will swallow up Mercury and Venus). At this point the element carbon is formed.  In more massive stars, even heavier elements such as oxygen and iron are created.
 
The most massive stars end their lives as supernovae, and this is where elements heavier than iron, such as uranium and gold, are formed.  
 
And every atom of gold in the ring I’m holding. Which is billions of years old.  In fact I may be holding most of the history of the universe in my hand.

Ukraine - reprised

7/2/2022

 
476 words; 4-minute read

The UK foreign secretary Liz Truss says that a peace deal with Russia is contingent on Vladimir Putin’s troops being pushed out of Ukraine and being held accountable for alleged war crimes. However we define ‘Ukraine’ (does it include only Donbas or Crimea too?) everyone knows this is a recipe for a war lasting years. Meanwhile UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson claims that if Putin were a woman he wouldn’t have started the war in the first place. He’s evidently not looked down the Cabinet table recently.
 
Johnson and Truss made these remarks at the recently completed NATO summit in Madrid, described by the BBC’s security correspondent Frank Gardner as a summit ‘for hawks’. It’s true that the industrial war machine could hardly have wished for a better outcome: a billion-pound package of UK military aid, two squadrons of US F35 stealth bombers, two naval destroyers to Spain and thousands of troops to Romania, and two new countries in the NATO fold - Finland and Sweden.
 
It’s hard to imagine an event more designed to push the end of the war far into the distant future than this NATO summit.
 
Meanwhile, more and more people in the poorest countries go hungry because Ukrainian grain and Russian fertiliser can’t be exported, inflation rates in Europe are higher than they have been for 40 years, and if nothing changes in the next few months European countries are likely to be subject to energy rationing in the autumn.
 
Daily, about 60-100 Ukrainian soldiers are dying and 500 wounded, the UK government estimates about 15,000 Russian dead, while the UN reckons that at least 4,700 Ukrainian civilians have died since the start of the war.  Put crudely, every day the war goes on another two or three hundred people die, several hundred are wounded and an uncounted number are displaced or exiled.
 
This is the reality that Truss, Johnson and the 30 NATO heads of government who have just wined, dined and back-slapped in Madrid have signed up to. Until Russia has been ‘pushed out of Ukraine’.
 
There is only one humane way out of this situation: an early ceasefire involving some ceding of territory by Ukraine and whatever guarantees and reparations can be wrung out of Putin’s reprehensible regime. The foundations for such an agreement could be laid right now, but the triumphalist NATO summit has made that impossible.  Much more likely is an accommodation sometime in the autumn or winter when soaring prices and energy rationing make a ceasefire more attractive to domestic audiences than constant sabre-rattling.
 
By then, thousands of soldiers and civilians who are alive today will be dead. This is certain. But these numbers played no part in the decision-making in Madrid. The only ones that seem to matter are those relating to the military machine’s bottom line.

    Andrew Dobson

    Archives

    January 2023
    November 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    February 2022
    September 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020

    Categories

    All
    Anthropocene
    Censorship
    Covid 19
    Identity Politics
    Justice
    Politics
    The Cosmos
    Ukraine

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly